List of 11 criteria as per UGC (minimum standard and procedure for award of Ph.D. degree) Regulation, amended Admission by entrance test or interview or both. Maximum number, M. Phil: 5, Ph.D.: 8 /Supervisor. National/ Reservation Policy. Course work/Research Methodology Theory Phd Thesis Criteria I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first:) Great job, thank you! does everything it says it will do and on time. You will not have a single worry if assists you on your schoolwork/10() • The length of the Thesis should preferably be restricted to printed pages. • The students are advised to restrict the total number of References to less than • Four softbound copies of the Thesis have to be submitted for evaluation. • If the Thesis is declared eligible
Doctoral Thesis Assessment Criteria – Thesislink
The most recent edition can be downloaded here student login required. These blog posts are written to help you understand the thesis and dissertation assessment process at AUT. However, please consult the AUT Postgraduate Handbook for official information phd thesis criteria assessment policies and procedures and discuss with your supervisor s. Last phd thesis criteria, we looked at the general process for assessing a thesis, and broke down the criteria for grading a Masters or Honours thesis or dissertation.
Examiners read your thesis and submit independent reports to the Graduate Research School, each making a provisional recommendation for a particular outcome. Reports are send to members of the AUT Examination Panel, consisting of the examiners, plus an independent convenor who ensures the fairness of the oral examination. The panel considers the reports in relation to the outcomes; if examiners provisionally recommend a pass outcomesthen an oral exam is planned, phd thesis criteria. If there is a major difference of opinion, there may be some negotiation with examiners prior to the exam proceeding.
Anonymised reports are normally released to you a week before the oral exam not showing the provisional recommendations. Examination Panel works toward a consensus on a final recommendation for a particular outcome.
This happens immediately after the oral; you will find out their recommendation at this point. The University Postgraduate Board considers the recommendation phd thesis criteria makes a final decision accepting the recommendation, if it is unanimous. You can find more details about this process on pages of the Postgraduate Handbook ; or check out pages if your research is practice-led.
You might assume that, for a complex piece of research and a complex assessment process, the assessment criteria would get a little more complicated too, phd thesis criteria. After all, a doctoral thesis is the longest, most challenging piece of writing you can do as a student. On the face of it, though, the assessment criteria seem less prescribed at this high level. There are ten criteria in all — six for the written thesis, and four for the oral exam — and each criterion is under 20 words long.
To understand why the criteria are seemingly broad, think about the outcomes of a doctoral thesis. Source: AUT Postgraduate Handbookp.
Note that even though doctoral assessment takes part in two phases, it is a continuous process. Source: Compiled from AUT Postgraduate Handbookp. Examiners are asked to consider your performance in relation to other doctoral candidates. If you have explained and justified your research phd thesis criteria, showing a good understanding of its relative merits and drawbacks for your particular project, phd thesis criteria, then you are likely to fare well on this criterion.
Masters research is not required to make such a contribution; this is particular to doctoral degrees. The requirement to make an original contribution to knowledge can sound intimidating. However, there are quite phd thesis criteria number of ways to meet it. Check out this past Thesislink post for ideas about how to make an original contribution. This criterion allows examiners phd thesis criteria a lot of scope to comment on your engagement with the literature in your field and related fieldsas well as your discussion of your own research.
The key takeaway from this criterion is that both depth and breadth are important in a successful doctoral thesis.
You need to balance your immersion in your specific research niche, with your awareness of other work in related phd thesis criteria. Examiners may phd thesis criteria on big-picture presentation issues like your thesis structure and quality of writing; they may even comment on specifics like your spelling, grammar, and formatting, phd thesis criteria. A doctoral degree is often the last barrier to entry into the academy; in a sense, the examiners are like the gatekeepers to a prestigious and historied world of intellect.
At the oral examination, your examiners will consider the contribution you have made through your research and your thesis, phd thesis criteria, and they make ask questions about where you think the originality lies in your work. As a potential doctor, phd thesis criteria, examiners will expect your critical faculties to phd thesis criteria sharp.
How well do you understand your own research and its context? How advanced, nuanced, and phd thesis criteria is your perspective? Examiners will consider the degree to which your thesis can be considered your work.
This is particularly relevant if you have chosen Pathway 2 thesis by publicationbecause any co-authors on your publications will be part-authors of the material included in your thesis. Examiners will be looking for you to defend those choices convincingly. Thanks for the blog about the pathway 1 or Format 1: Traditional thesis assessment criteria. I have recently defended my thesis based on pathway 2 or Format 2: Manuscript style thesis and it was entirely different from what you stated, from the beginning writing the thesis to the end defending my oral.
Although the essence of assessment criteria and the outcomes are the same, in practice it is a whole lot different. Can I ask you, if you can publish some guidelines phd thesis criteria the format-2 thesis, based on my experience. I struggled a lot as there was not enough exemplar to follow apart from the guidance given the the Postgraduate handbook.
Thanks, Prabakar Parthiban. Hi Prabakar, thanks for your comment. The format 2 thesis process is definitely quite different to the format 1 process, and can vary a lot from person to person. If you have some valuable insights to share from your personal experience, you are very welcome to submit a piece of writing about your journey with format 2.
Your email address will not be published. Save my name, phd thesis criteria, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. You sit the oral exam. Criterion 2: Appropriateness of research methodology If you have explained and justified your research methodology, phd thesis criteria, showing a good understanding of its relative merits and drawbacks for your particular project, then you are likely to fare well on this criterion.
Criterion 4: Depth and breadth of subject matter coverage This criterion allows examiners quite a lot of scope phd thesis criteria comment on your engagement with the literature in your field and related fieldsas well as your discussion of your own research. Criterion 5: Thesis presentation Examiners may comment on big-picture presentation issues like your thesis structure and quality of writing; they may even comment on specifics like your spelling, phd thesis criteria, grammar, and formatting.
Criteria 3: Your contribution Examiners will consider the degree to which your thesis can be considered your work. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Print. About Anaise Irvine Dr Anaise Irvine is the Editor of Thesislink. She has a research background in science and narrative. Her PhD research analysed how contemporary films and novels represent genetic engineering as a social justice issue. She has previously researched fictional phd thesis criteria of evolution and quantum mechanics, phd thesis criteria.
See all posts by Anaise Irvine. Throwback Thursday — PhD Write-Away: A motivation booster and social bonding. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
How to finish a PhD thesis quickly - 5 simple tips to write a thesis in two months!
, time: 12:20
Mar 25, · Criteria 1: Original contribution. At the oral examination, your examiners will consider the contribution you have made through your research and your thesis, and they make ask questions about where you think the originality lies in your work. Criteria 2: Critical judgement & understandingEstimated Reading Time: 8 mins Phd Thesis Criteria I didn’t even believe it was my essay at first:) Great job, thank you! does everything it says it will do and on time. You will not have a single worry if assists you on your schoolwork/10() CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING PhD THESIS Although different examiners will adopt different methods of examining the thesis and for conducting the oral examination, there are some general criteria for evaluating PhD theses that may be useful for students to bear File Size: KB
No comments:
Post a Comment